Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Live reporting of 26/11 was totally wrong & unacceptable: Supreme Court

  1. #1
    !! PostMaster !! Field Marshal passion_unlimitedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guwahati, Assam
    Posts
    149,127
    Rep Power
    100

    Default Live reporting of 26/11 was totally wrong & unacceptable: Supreme Court

    Live reporting of 26/11 was totally wrong & unacceptable: Supreme Court





    Slamming TV channels for live coverage of the 26/11 Mumbai attack, the SC said it was "totally wrong and unacceptable" as it made security forces' fight with terrorists "exceedingly difficult."







    NEW DELHI: Slamming TV channels for live coverage of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, the Supreme Court today said it was "totally wrong and unacceptable" as it made security forces' fight with terrorists "exceedingly difficult."

    "Any attempt to justify the conduct of the TV channels by citing the right to freedom of speech and expression would be totally wrong and unacceptable in such a situation. The freedom of speech and expression, like all other freedoms under Article 19, is subject to reasonable restrictions.

    "An action tending to violate another person's right to life guaranteed under Article 21 or putting the national security in jeopardy can never be justified by taking the plea of freedom of speech and expression," said a bench of justices Aftab Alam and C K Prasad in its verdict that upheld the death sentence awarded to terrorist Ajmal Kasab.

    "It is beyond doubt that the way their (securioty forces') operations were freely shown made the task of the security forces not only exceedingly difficult but also dangerous and risky," it added.

    The bench also questioned the media's argument that the regulatory mechanism for it must come only from within.

    "It is in such extreme cases that the credibility of an institution is tested. The coverage of the Mumbai terror attack by the mainstream electronic media has done much harm to the argument that any regulatory mechanism for the media must only come from within," the bench said.

    The bench said by covering live the terrorists attack on Mumbai in the way it was done, Indian TV channels were not serving any "national interest or the social cause", but they were acting in their own commercial interests putting the national security in "jeopardy".

    "The shots and visuals that were shown live by the TV channels could have also been shown after all the terrorists were neutralised and the security operations were over.

    "But, in that case the TV programmes would not have had the same shrill, scintillating and chilling effect and would not have shot up the TRP ratings of the channels," it said.



    Play To Win or Don't Play At All
    Always Expect The Unexpected

  2. #2
    Hum Banarasi.......... Colonel Ankhi_sena_mun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dheer sameere, Tatini Teere....
    Posts
    14,422
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Shaam-e-Avadh is very tiring

  3. #3
    Machinehead Lieutenant General ignoramusenator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Neverland
    Posts
    53,738
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    why dont give them some fines, and distribute those to the victim's family
    they obviously made some bucks from it!
    TV channels should come into front and help those who died of their stupidity


    Make My Day

  4. #4
    One Man Army,Ekla Chalo:) Lieutenant General
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    63,905
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Sun will rise.?.!

  5. #5
    Rainbow chaser Major General
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Looking for one
    Posts
    37,824
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by passion_unlimitedd View Post
    Live reporting of 26/11 was totally wrong & unacceptable: Supreme Court





    Slamming TV channels for live coverage of the 26/11 Mumbai attack, the SC said it was "totally wrong and unacceptable" as it made security forces' fight with terrorists "exceedingly difficult."






    The bench said by covering live the terrorists attack on Mumbai in the way it was done, Indian TV channels were not serving any "national interest or the social cause", but they were acting in their own commercial interests putting the national security in "jeopardy".




    Correct, all for TRP.

    let it rain over me....

  6. #6
    !! PostMaster !! Field Marshal passion_unlimitedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guwahati, Assam
    Posts
    149,127
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Still there is no law against it ...
    Play To Win or Don't Play At All
    Always Expect The Unexpected

  7. #7
    Rainbow chaser Major General
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Looking for one
    Posts
    37,824
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by passion_unlimitedd View Post
    Still there is no law against it ...
    The problem is these are new technology, which can not be controlled by Law on all aspects, until we experience the situation, Good thing was that the media had maintained a self control after this incidence, but sad part is still some channels don't follow, so here Govt need to intervene & have a strict law
    let it rain over me....

  8. #8
    Moderator Colonel gracefulguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    12,581
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    "It is in such extreme cases that the credibility of an institution is tested. The coverage of the Mumbai terror attack by the mainstream electronic media has done much harm to the argument that any regulatory mechanism for the media must only come from within," the bench said.


    bahut hi sachchi baat boli SC ne.....

    The channels will never realise how many people lost their lives because of the transmission......including our jawans.....
    "I'm always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught"

  9. #9
    !! PostMaster !! Field Marshal passion_unlimitedd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Guwahati, Assam
    Posts
    149,127
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Is TRP ke chalte saare moral responsibility bech kha gaye mediawale ...

  10. #10
    █●тнє ρяιη¢є σƒ вєηgαℓ●█ Lieutenant-Colonel Sujoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    вhαrαt
    Posts
    11,813
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    They should be fined ..

Similar Threads

  1. Supreme Court defines who's an idiot
    By pup in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 05:34 PM
  2. Supreme Court judges declare assets
    By Rocky-10 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2009, 08:02 PM
  3. Those who burn brides need to be hanged : Supreme Court
    By Rocky-10 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 12:50 PM
  4. Change Of Law By Supreme Court Of India !
    By Fastidious in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30-08-2008, 12:06 AM
  5. Use email to petition the Supreme Court of India
    By aman_singh1985@msn.com in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-10-2006, 12:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •